“I sleep, with the doors tightly shut,
I sleep, with the intruder alarm aptly in place.
I sleep, with a gun under my pillow,
I sleep, in my panic room”
The “so-insinuated” callous decision of the Supreme Court to
execute combined with the “showcased” lack of sympathy by the President to
commute or pardon has been widely reported by the media, so Yakub Memon has
definitely earned some commiserations among the de facto rulers of the
democracy, the people. How can a terrorist who has waged a war with the
country, engaged innocent civilians into warfare, bred fear into the hearts of
children earn such sympathy amongst so many of us? How are we able to judge the
contention that he is innocent? Is he our true friend, were we involved in the
investigation and interrogation when it was in progress, or were we the court
judge who had to make the hard decision to grant the verdict to execute him
provided all the necessary evidence? Then how come we know that he is not so
evil and is being wrongly sentenced? On what basis is our opinion grounded so
firmly? How come I know I am going to protest in support of a man who has
hardly been closer than a thousand kilometer of radius of my existence? Our
sentiments have been swayed to take a stand by the watchdogs of democracy, the
media, which has the kept the most powerful and the fearless of men in check
and has kept its liability firmly to the common man.
Now, here is a straight forward question, how has media
successfully convinced us that the convicted terrorist deserves some mercy at
least a commutation? A father breaking down on seeing his daughter, a pregnant
wife left alone in an unfamiliar land, an innocent man being betrayed by his
own treacherous brother to take the blame for mistakes that were never his own,
sounds familiar? These were the tactics that have been widely used to create a
picture of a man, who has been innocently convicted for “masterminding” an act
of terrorism that has left many families destroyed. Did he leave his pregnant
wife behind to fight against the atrocious actions of a colonial power like our
freedom fighters or to protect a motherland from external aggression like our
brave soldiers? But he left her behind to create more such pregnant women
waiting for their husbands to return home, to create more daughters who may
breakdown when their fathers name might be mentioned. The innocent father,
husband, brother image so actively publicized by the media has nothing but
emotionally blackmailed us to ignore the actions of a man who has been
responsible for conspiring and executing the killings such fathers, husbands
and brothers.
My intent here is not to express my opinions on the rights
and wrongs of the verdict upheld or to gather support for or against Memon. I
am simply trying to analyze the role the media is playing in this particular
scenario. Let me draw a parallel; remember the hijack of the Indian Airlines
flight in 1999? The demand was to release the prisoners from Indian jails in
return for the hostages. At the time of negotiations, the media took a stand,
it made the country sympathize with the passengers on board, it made us
empathize with the families of the hostages by telecasting the terrors of these
families in losing their loved ones and through these actions media justified
its stand to make the government listen to voices of the people to release the
prisoners in return for securing the hostages on board. Which the government
did, not doing so would have been anti-national at least after all the polarization
the media had done. It was appreciable of the media to take a stand and do what
they did, but the story doesn’t end here, once the terrorists were released and
the hostages secured, the media had taken a different stand altogether, it
lashed out at the government for making compromises and bending to the whims of
the terrorists, it now started telecasting the atrocities of the men who were
released and spoke in volumes about the weakness of the government to stand its
ground, releasing terrorists who were captured with great difficulty in return
for a few Indian lives was suddenly made to seem like a very bad idea!
Today, the media seems to be preoccupied with granting some
relief to an innocent Memon, now an interesting question is, if Memons life is
spared from the death sentence, will the media hold on to its stand or would it
make a 180 degree flip like the earlier case and start to showcase victims of
the 1993 bombings and make the decision to spare Memons life a mistake? If so,
then for justice it is but a lose-lose situation. Media has manipulated us to
support relief for Memon but tomorrow, it will make us feel otherwise if his
life is spared, do we have any opinion of our own after our thoughts have been so
heavily polarized by this Mega Media Blackmail?